Make a Donation to the NBN

The NBN is run by volunteers, but the network has expenses. If you like what we do, consider making a contribution

View on Amazon

First, the conventional wisdom. Because Homo sapiens are a young species and haven’t had time to genetically differentiate, we modern humans are all basically genetically identical. Because Homo sapiens figured out ways to use culture to overcome natural selection, human genetic evolution ceased ages ago. Because Homo sapiens are genetically very similar and not subject to natural selection, the differences that we see today among modern human groups are the result of cultural processes, not genes.

Not so say Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending in their challenging and sure-to-be-controversial new book The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution (Basic Books, 2009).  We are extraordinarily similar genetically, but the minor differences occasionally had very important consequences: a difference of one or two nucleotides–among billions–could mean life or death for entire populations.  These minor differences, where advantageous, were selected for and spread in the ordinary natural selective way: if you developed resistance to malaria in the tropics, you survived and your genes were passed on; if not, then not. Finally, these genetic advantages accumulated: populations that had been put under more “pressure” were more robust than those living in  relaxed environments.The more robust populations prospered; the less robust did not.

Interesting for the historian will be the point that most of the enhanced “pressure” was due to historical factors. According to Cochran and Harpending, the transition to agriculture roughly 10,000 years ago in particular forced Homo sapiens to do things that they were not “programmed” (so to say) to do. Those who adapted genetically survived; those who did not, did not. Thus Homo sapiens 1.0 (the hunter-gatherer model) evolved into Homo sapiens 2.0 (the farming model). Cochran and Harpending submit that this process–natural selection due to cultural pressure–has been going on quite recently and may be going on today. For example, they propose that historical factors in the European Middle Ages favored the differential reproduction of brainy Azhkenazi Jews, the results of which can be seen in the differential success of their descendants in brainy occupations.

Hackle-raising stuff to be sure. Is any of it true? Listen to the interview, read the book and decide for yourself.

Please become a fan of “New Books in History” on Facebook if you haven’t already.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Mel January 12, 2010 at 9:19 pm

Hello,
I read your preview piece on azureonline. You said that you had a tough time with this book. When I read that I thought that perhaps you’d like to read an online book by professor Francisco Gil-White on race “science”.

Regards

Mel January 12, 2010 at 9:21 pm

Sorry, the link to the book is:
http://www.hirhome.com/rr/rrintro.htm

pamunkey December 27, 2013 at 6:10 pm

This is a wonderfully stimulating & though provoking podcast! It’s impressive & amazing that Cochran (& Harpending) accurately predicted Neandertal introgression – soon to be much more substantiated genetically after their book came out. they called it correctly in advance – because of what they knew of math, humans, & science — 3 things that “Mel” above might want to learn about – “Mel” might want to read the book or at least listen to the podcast before posting. Tremendous interview – it’s like speed reading the book in a little over 60 minutes! 3 cheers to Marshall Poe for being so knowledgeable about this area & for being willing to interview someone controversial (being willing to look beyond the PC police into the actual findings of science: that biology isn’t always fair!:-0) This interview was NEVER boring – kudos to all – the fact that they accurately predicted Neandertal introgression is still jaw dropping to me!

Kurt September 8, 2014 at 6:04 pm

Like Cochran, I come from a physics background (though in my case only a B.S.) and it was this book that got me obsessively reading population genetics textbooks (whoa, whoa… civilization may have accelerated human evolution?!). While it still seems unlikely to me that Neanderthal introgression actually kicked off the Neolithic Revolution, I agree with pamunky that the prediction that modern humans interbred with them at all, in near-complete contradiction to the null theories of the field, is very impressive. Rarely has a book fundamentally altered my view the world as much this one has. So buy it, read it, and share it with your open-minded friends.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: